THE MYANMAR CRISIS: INTERROGATING THE LIMITS OF ASEAN’S CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT AND NEW PATHWAYS TO PEACE

Authors

  • Johan Saravanamuttu Adjunct Professor, AEI, UM

Keywords:

Constructive engagement, Myanmar crisis, norm setting, norm socialisation, the ASEAN Way, sovereign accountability

Abstract

The paper is structured in three parts. First, it presents briefly the history of the concept of Constructive Engagement (CE) which emerged as a foil for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’s to address the Cambodian conflict. CE was premised on ASEAN’s diplomatic culture of norm-setting and norm socialization via the ASEAN Way. The paper posits that ASEAN, as a regional entity, embeds inter-state constitutive and prescriptive norms with an imperative to regularly seek new modalities of intramural conflict management. ASEAN’s plurality and diversity of membership predisposes it to medium and long-term processes of norm-setting as the means to address regime legitimacy and accountability within the constraints of the ASEAN Way. An obvious question arises as to whether the Myanmar crisis presents itself as the extreme or limiting case to date of the efficacy of ASEAN’s CE approach as a subset of its diplomatic culture to manage recalcitrant states. ASEAN's current engagement via its Five-Point Consensus approach to deal with the Myanmar crisis has yielded few positive outcomes four years after the military coup of 2021. The paper examines Malaysia’s active engagement with Myanmar under the CE rubric dating to Myanmar’s membership of ASEAN in 1997, which it advocated. In more recent years, Malaysia has also borne the brunt of the massive impact of Rohingya migration to its shores as a fallout of the Myanmar crisis. This predisposes Malaysia to play an important role, especially in 2025 as Chair of ASEAN. Finally, the paper explores a constructivist pathway out of the Myanmar impasse for ASEAN. It argues that innovative processes beyond ASEAN’s Five-Point Consensus approach to the Myanmar crisis are needed to return Myanmar to a situation of sovereign accountability. Beyond state-to-state engagements, non-state actors could also play a significant role regionally on respective national terrains. In its current situation of civil war, this calls for ASEAN to recognise and engage with all the key stakeholders of the Myanmar Resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Johan Saravanamuttu, Adjunct Professor, AEI, UM

Johan Saravanamuttu is Professor Emeritus of Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Adjunct Professor at Asia-Europe Institute, University of Malaya and Adjunct Senior Fellow, RSIS, Nanyang Technological University (2016-2023). He was Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore from 2007.In 1997, he was Visiting Chair of ASEAN and International Studies at the Centre for International Studies (CIS), University of Toronto. He has published extensively on Malaysia, its foreign policy, the middle class, general elections, the New Economic Policy and political Islam. His publications include: Malaysia’s Foreign Policy, the First 50 Years: Alignment, Neutralism, Islamism, Singapore: ISEAS 2010, Power Sharing in a Divided Nation: Mediated Communalism and New Politics over Six Decades of Elections in Malaysia, Singapore: ISEAS 2016, The Cambodian Conflict 1979-1991: From Intervention to Resolution, Research and Education for Peace, USM, Dept of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, 1996 (co-author with Peter Wallensteen and Ramses Amer). He can be contacted at jsaravanamuttu@gmail.com

Published

2025-05-07

How to Cite

Saravanamuttu, J. (2025). THE MYANMAR CRISIS: INTERROGATING THE LIMITS OF ASEAN’S CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT AND NEW PATHWAYS TO PEACE . AEI Insights, 10(1), 41–55. Retrieved from https://ijps.um.edu.my/index.php/AEIINSIGHTS/article/view/59882