INCONSISTENCIES IN DETECTING RDRP GENE BY RDRP CONFIRMATORY ASSAY LEADING TO FALSE NEGATIVE COVID-19 RESULTS: A CASE REPORT FROM A DISTRICT REFERRAL HOSPITAL

Received 2020-08-27; Accepted 2020-09-15; Published 2020-12-10

Authors

  • Yong Jo Yen Department of Medicine, Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Mangalam Sinniah Clinipath Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Joash Tan-Loh Department of Medicine, Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Nor Akmal Mokhtar Department of Microbiology, Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Brian Cheong Mun Keong Department of Medicine, Hospital Teluk Intan, Perak, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/jummec.sp2020no1.2

Keywords:

SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, RT-PCR, False Negative, Prolonged Viral Shedding

Abstract

Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) should be interpreted with clinical, epidemiological history and exposure risk to avoid misdiagnosis. We report a cruise-ship worker with significant travelling history, presented with acute respiratory symptoms and radiographic evidence of viral pneumonia. Initial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene confirmatory assay was negative. Use of a more robust RT-PCR assay detected ORF1ab, N and S genes for COVID-19, and the diagnosis was supported by an IgM and IgG positive COVID-19 serology. Subsequent follow up samples which reported inconsistencies in detecting RdRp gene also raise the concern of reliability of RdRp gene as the confirmatory assay for diagnosis of COVID-19. Patient later had prolonged viral shedding beyond serological recovery, with a negative viral culture reflecting non-infectivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-10

Issue

Section

Research article